If you’ve ever been in my office (my official office in the math department, I mean, not the coffeeshop which I affectionately refer to as my “Fenton office”), you know that I have lots of stuff. Decks of cards of every shape and size, all sorts of dice, Rubik’s cubes and variations, etc. And if you’ve ever sat in on one of my math classes, you know how often I’ll lead with an example involving a game or a thought experiment involving rolling dice, dealing cards, or counting something.

And if you know both of those things, you’re probably wondering why I almost never bring any visual aids. I roll imaginary dice, I carefully shuffle imaginary cards. Even when I’m wearing my corduroy jacket (which always has at least one deck of cards in the inside pocket), I don’t use them. I pantomime.

Why?

Because when I say, “Suppose I have a deck of cards, and I divide it into two piles like this…,” everyone’s eyes are on me. They have to be, and the students know they have to be. They have to follow my every pantomime or they won’t know what’s going on. They can’t take a look-out-the-window break and wait until I’ve finished doing what I’m doing, then look and see where the cards ended up. They have to pay active attention, to imagine the cards and dice and figure out what is happening. Because it’s not true that I don’t use cards. I do use cards. And the cards I use are in my students’ minds.

Students rarely give you their undivided attention, but almost no one wants to give her teacher zero attention. It’s natural to pay at least nominal attention. This gimmick means that students have to decide between paying no attention whatsoever and actively engaging their minds in what I’m saying, doing, introducing; there’s nothing in between.

This entry was posted on Friday, September 24th, 2010 at 7:55 pm and is filed under Teaching. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Is teaching math about the professor getting the attention of students? I may be wrong about this but I don’t trust teachers ( or anyone else for that matter ) who put their statements in writing. Imho teaching math is all about students learning to read ( math ). Initiate them, do not entertain them.

( Corrected version )
Is teaching math about the professor getting the attention of students? I may be wrong about this but I don’t trust teachers ( or anyone else for that matter ) who don’t put their statements in writing. Imho teaching math is all about students learning to read ( math ). Initiate them, do not entertain them.

I think perhaps you misunderstand my point. I’m not saying my classes are just mime shows. I write down plenty: I fill blackboards, I post online supplements to lectures when this is called for, depending on the course I even have slideshows. And I like your word “initiate”: I tell all my students that in this class, everyone will be treated as a mathematician; in that spirit, I am not afraid to introduce higher math concepts, even in a basic calculus class, when they can illuminate or clarify the material. I think that the dumbing down of mathematics perpetrated by so many of my colleagues is born of an underestimate of what students are capable of and does a disservice to everyone; I resist it at every turn.

No, this post was talking about just a specific little piece of my classroom practice: the example problem or situation which kicks off a section or topic. There’d be a couple of these in a week, each lasting a few minutes. I firmly believe that mathematical content is more meaningful for students who have, in advance, thought or played with the kind of problem which the new ideas were created to solve. This kind of pre-thinking from students cannot be coerced (though I’d like to), but it can be stimulated.

Thanks to all my friends who "stood with Cap" at CA: Civil War tonight. 1 year ago

Some days, working so far from my family is harder than others. Having Take Your Kids to Work Day fall on my birthday -- the worst so far. 1 year ago

Listening to my sons sing the Dr. Horrible soundtrack. So it's a good day. 1 year ago

My 4 year old is hoping to turn 8 on his birthday this week so he can be the older brother. 2 years ago

Made three taues for semi tau day to bring to work tomorrow. Also made a spectacular mess of my kitchen. 2 years ago

Happy 137th birthday to Albert Einstein! And happy Semi Tau Day! 2 years ago

My almost-5-year-old just requested a specific lullaby which I haven't sung in years. 2 years ago

Taking a few days away from designing slot machines in Chicago to craft national math competitions in Washington, D.C. That sounds like me. 2 years ago

And once again, my 7 year old beats me at a game of Haunting House. 2 years ago

Watching the kids (ages 12, 7, 4) all play "Just Dance" together. Well worth price of Kinect. 2 years ago

Is teaching math about the professor getting the attention of students? I may be wrong about this but I don’t trust teachers ( or anyone else for that matter ) who put their statements in writing. Imho teaching math is all about students learning to read ( math ). Initiate them, do not entertain them.

( Corrected version )

Is teaching math about the professor getting the attention of students? I may be wrong about this but I don’t trust teachers ( or anyone else for that matter ) who don’t put their statements in writing. Imho teaching math is all about students learning to read ( math ). Initiate them, do not entertain them.

I think perhaps you misunderstand my point. I’m not saying my classes are just mime shows. I write down plenty: I fill blackboards, I post online supplements to lectures when this is called for, depending on the course I even have slideshows. And I like your word “initiate”: I tell all my students that in this class, everyone will be treated as a mathematician; in that spirit, I am not afraid to introduce higher math concepts, even in a basic calculus class, when they can illuminate or clarify the material. I think that the dumbing down of mathematics perpetrated by so many of my colleagues is born of an underestimate of what students are capable of and does a disservice to everyone; I resist it at every turn.

No, this post was talking about just a specific little piece of my classroom practice: the example problem or situation which kicks off a section or topic. There’d be a couple of these in a week, each lasting a few minutes. I firmly believe that mathematical content is more meaningful for students who have, in advance, thought or played with the kind of problem which the new ideas were created to solve. This kind of pre-thinking from students cannot be coerced (though I’d like to), but it can be stimulated.

Mike, I love this entry. I think you could publish this blog. That from a mother.